Contemporaries who agreed with franck’s argument in the second and third paragraphs regarding the need for an international agreement would most likely have made which of the following arguments to support their position?

Question: Contemporaries who agreed with franck’s argument in the second and third paragraphs regarding the need for an international agreement would most likely have made which of the following arguments to support their position? 

Contemporaries who agreed with Franck's argument for an international agreement would likely argue that nuclear weapons pose a global threat that cannot be addressed by individual states alone. They would point out that the catastrophic consequences of a nuclear war would affect not only the warring nations but also the entire world. Therefore, an international agreement is necessary to ensure that nuclear weapons are only used for deterrence purposes and never deployed in a conflict. Such an agreement would also create a system of verification and disarmament that would prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and reduce the risk of nuclear war. Ultimately, they would argue that only through collective action and cooperation can we ensure global peace and security in the nuclear age.

Rjwala

Rjwala is your freely Ai Social Learning Platform. here our team solve your academic problems daily.