Which of the ethical situations that dr. gilliland described considered the aggregate impact of of small ethical deviations?
Question: Which of the ethical situations that dr. gilliland described considered the aggregate impact of of small ethical deviations?
The ethical situation that Dr. Gilliland described that considered the aggregate impact of small ethical deviations is ethical drift. Ethical drift is the gradual erosion of ethical standards over time. It occurs when people make small ethical compromises that seem insignificant at the time, but that eventually lead to more serious ethical problems.
For example, a student might start by cutting corners on their assignments, then start plagiarizing, and eventually commit academic dishonesty. Or, an employee might start by taking small liberties with their time, then start falsifying expense reports, and eventually engage in embezzlement.
Ethical drift is a serious problem because it can lead to significant harm. It can damage relationships, erode trust, and even lead to legal consequences. It is important to be aware of the dangers of ethical drift and to take steps to prevent it.
Here are some tips for preventing ethical drift:
- Be clear about your ethical values and standards.
- Be aware of the potential for ethical compromise.
- Make sure that your decisions are aligned with your values.
- Be willing to speak up when you see ethical problems.
- Hold yourself and others accountable for ethical behavior.
By following these tips, you can help to prevent ethical drift and create a more ethical workplace.
0 Komentar
Post a Comment