Which one of the following is not an ‘administrator’ in terms of the promotion of administrative justice act 3 of 2000?
Question: Which one of the following is not an ‘administrator’ in terms of the promotion of administrative justice act 3 of 2000?
The President of South Africa taking administrative action is NOT an 'administrator' in terms of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000.
The Act defines an 'administrator' as a person who takes administrative action. This includes a natural person (such as an individual official), an organ of state (such as a government department or agency), and a juristic person (such as a company or organization) taking administrative action. However, the President of South Africa is excluded from this definition.
The reason for this exclusion is that the President has a special role in the South African government. The President is the head of state and government, and is responsible for the overall functioning of the government. The President also has a number of discretionary powers, which means that he or she is not always bound by the law when making decisions.
The Promotion of Administrative Justice Act is designed to hold administrators accountable for their decisions and actions. However, it is not appropriate to hold the President accountable in the same way as other administrators. The President's special role and discretionary powers mean that he or she must have the freedom to make decisions without being subject to the same level of scrutiny.
Therefore, the answer to your question is: The President of South Africa taking administrative action.
0 Komentar
Post a Comment