All of the following statements about armand-guy kersaint are factually accurate. which would best explain why, unlike the author of source 2, kersaint is not calling for the unconditional and immediate abolition of slavery?
Question: All of the following statements about armand-guy kersaint are factually accurate. which would best explain why, unlike the author of source 2, kersaint is not calling for the unconditional and immediate abolition of slavery?
- Kersaint was a naval officer and a politician who participated in the French Revolution.
- Kersaint was a member of the Society of the Friends of the Blacks, an abolitionist group that advocated for the rights of free people of color and gradual emancipation of slaves.
- Kersaint was the author of a report on the colonies that proposed a constitutional reform to grant more autonomy and representation to the colonists, but also to maintain slavery under certain conditions.
- Kersaint was executed by the guillotine in 1793 after being accused of treason for his moderate views on the colonies and the monarchy.
The best explanation for why Kersaint did not support immediate abolition of slavery is that he was a pragmatist who tried to balance the interests of different groups and avoid a violent conflict. He believed that slavery was an injustice, but he also recognized that it was an economic necessity for the colonies and that abolishing it abruptly would provoke a rebellion from the white planters. He hoped that by granting more rights and freedoms to the free people of color and by improving the conditions of the slaves, he could pave the way for a gradual and peaceful transition to emancipation. He also feared that if France abolished slavery unilaterally, it would lose its colonies to other European powers that still practiced slavery. Therefore, he advocated for a reform that would preserve the unity and sovereignty of France while respecting the diversity and autonomy of the colonies.
0 Komentar
Post a Comment